History often feels distant until you follow the roots of an industrial chemical. Zinc hydroxy stannate (ZHS) has a story that stretches back to the growing pains of modern flame retardancy. Flame hazards worried manufacturers after several large-scale fires made daily headlines in the mid-20th century. Seeking alternatives to halogenated flame retardants, researchers found that tin-based compounds could slow down burning without releasing toxic halogens. Zinc stannate's place at the table followed soon after, introducing hydroxy stannate to blend the strengths of both zinc and tin into a white powder with strong fire resistance. Early adopters in Europe and Japan dove into lab trials, tweaking pH and reaction times, until a workable recipe hit the market. Regulations around halogenated compounds tightened in the 1980s, and ZHS started popping up in cables and plastics across a range of industries.
The product today lands in the world as a fine white powder, often packed in polyethylene-lined paper bags. ZHS gets blended straight into plastics, rubbers, and coatings to keep things from catching fire or producing toxic smoke. Most manufacturers pride themselves on purity, as industrial buyers demand minimal impurities for predictable results. The compound bridges the needs of both formulators who want it in powder form and processors who prefer water-dispersible granules, and sometimes surface-treated grades serve composite manufacturers.
Zinc hydroxy stannate holds the formula ZnSn(OH)6. It pops up as an odorless white powder, showing off a molecular weight near 295 g/mol. With a melting point far above most plastics—over 200°C—processors find it won’t break down inside typical extruders. The density runs about 3.3 g/cm³, which means formulations need fine-tuning to avoid loaded materials feeling heavy. ZHS does not dissolve in water; it remains stable and only reacts strongly with concentrated acids or bases. This characteristic keeps it inert through normal use but gives chemists a handle for further chemical modifications. Particle size can run from submicron powders to several microns, depending on grinding and precipitation controls during manufacture.
Labels for ZHS ought to be straightforward: chemical name, CAS number (12027-96-2), moisture content, purity percentage (often >97%), and heavy metals content. Suppliers list packing information and safety standards on every bag, plus batch numbers for traceability. Each shipment rolls out with a certificate of analysis, showing a tight window on product consistency—nobody wants surprises in a processing line.
Making ZHS in a plant boils down to controlled precipitation. Tin chloride or tin sulfate gets mixed with zinc sulfate solution under alkaline conditions, sparking a reaction that drops out zinc hydroxy stannate as a fine white precipitate. Filtering, washing, and drying lock in the right composition. Careful control of pH and mixing speed makes all the difference in keeping particles fine and uniform. Some suppliers build in washing steps to keep impurities low; others introduce extra hydrothermal steps for powders meant for transparent coatings.
Chemists didn’t stop at the base formula. Surface modifications add another layer of performance. Treating ZHS with silanes or titanates, for example, improves compatibility with polar polymers like PVC. Under heat, ZHS interacts with polyvinyl chloride to trap hydrochloric acid gas—one reason plastics experts rely on it in cable insulation. Tackling synergists like antimony trioxide, ZHS brings fire safety up a notch without as much environmental scrutiny. Some teams experiment by co-precipitating with other flame retardants to get each ingredient working better together—something you see in new patents where ZHS teams up with zinc borate or magnesium hydroxide.
People might run across ZHS as zinc stannate hydrate, zinc tin hydroxide, or simply basic zinc stannate. Major chemical houses and specialty suppliers market it under their own trade names, shifting formulation tweaks for color, particle size, or dispersibility. Still, the core chemistry remains, regardless of branding.
Real-world use calls for a close look at handling and exposure. ZHS doesn’t throw up major health alarms; powders always present some risk to lungs with extended exposure, so proper masks and dust control are basic shop-floor protocol. Company safety data sheets lay out good practices, listing it as not classified as hazardous under GHS, though monitoring for tin and zinc in air makes sense over years in concentrated industrial settings. Prolonged exposure studies show little cause for concern with skin contact, a comfort for hands-on operators. Environmental releases get managed with proper wastewater treatment—tin and zinc pose less risk than legacy flame retardants, which still show up in sediment samples decades after their phase-out.
The most visible place to spot ZHS work is in the insulation around electrical wires. Add it to PVC, and the cable sheath resists catching fire while giving off less choking smoke. That shift matters in subways and tunnels, where every second counts during an emergency. Building panels and floor coverings use ZHS for similar reasons. Beyond construction, coatings on electronics casings and automotive interiors draw on ZHS to meet strict fire codes. Some industrial uses branch out into adhesives and sealants, as industries chase non-halogenated fire safety for green building certifications. Rubber belts and conveyor systems in factories pick up ZHS, since a single spark can trigger an expensive fire. As batteries come under scrutiny, there’s more talk of ZHS coatings for thermal management in lithium-ion packs.
Industrial R&D doesn’t stand still. Research groups keep hunting for ways to tune ZHS for emerging regulations and new material systems. Papers out of Asia show that nano-sized ZHS may work with bio-based epoxy resins, tapping into the same fire resistance with lower loadings. Some startups tinker with different tin sources or recycled zinc feedstocks, aiming for circular economy labels on the finished product. Cross-linking ZHS with phosphate-based flame retardants draws interest for electric vehicles, since lithium battery fires demand new flame barriers. Patent filings spike around improved dispersion, surface treatments, and hybrid powder blends—every step designed to beat legacy products at both safety and regulatory hurdles.
Toxicity matters for any chemical in daily contact with people. Long-term studies on ZHS don't show carcinogenic or reproductive risks at workplace exposures, with regulators assigning it a generally safe profile. Acute toxicity numbers run high, indicating low risk through ingestion or skin exposure—unlike older brominated flame retardants linked to thyroid or hormone disruption in aquatic species. That’s a key reason ZHS finds its way into children’s toys and electronic casings. As always, chronic inhalation gets a closer look. Workplace monitors check for respirable dust, and improved pelletizing steps cut airborne particle counts. Researchers keep an eye on tin and zinc bioaccumulation, but exposure data from end-of-life recycling and landfill leachate studies show stubbornly low mobility of the hydroxy stannate form in soil and water systems.
Looking ahead, ZHS holds a seat at the table as industries ditch halogenated flame retardants for greener options. Mandates for recyclable, non-toxic materials open doors. Hybrid flame retardant blends promise stronger performance at lower cost, especially with battery and electronics demand rising. The drive for performance in thinner materials means ZHS research leans heavily into nanotechnology—smaller particles, improved surface bonding, enhanced smoke suppression without adding weight. Regulatory pressure won’t let up, and ZHS manufacturers chase ways to bring in recycled zinc and waste tin streams. End-users look for life cycle data, pushing producers to invest in independent toxicity, environmental persistence, and fire safety studies. The story of ZHS unfolds as both a lesson in adaptation and a nudge to do better with everyday materials that keep modern life safer.
Zinc hydroxy stannate doesn’t get a lot of spotlight outside chemical circles, but its role in slowing fires carries weight both in industry and in daily life. In the constant struggle to make materials safer, especially plastics and coatings, this compound acts as a flame retardant and smoke suppressant. That means it helps buy precious seconds when fires break out. This isn’t just about ticking off a box for regulatory approval – think of public transportation, high-rise apartments, or family homes. Researchers have shown that adding zinc hydroxy stannate to plastic formulas can sharply curb smoke production and toxic gas release, offering people a better chance of getting out safely. For me, that puts a tangible face on why safer, slower-burning product design matters.
Wires and cables wind through almost every building and device, from hospital scanners to subway tracks. Fires fueled by faulty wiring demand solutions that don’t just slow flames but cut down on dangerous fumes. Zinc hydroxy stannate often ends up inside cable insulation – not to make headlines, but to keep small problems from becoming tragedies. Many cable makers rely on this material because it plays nicely with common compounds, avoiding clumping or weakening the final plastic. A study out of Europe backs up what engineers see on the ground: electrical cables with zinc hydroxy stannate resist fire better without giving up flexibility or toughness.
There’s no question that the push for sustainable building needs plastics and composites that are less of a threat in a disaster. While swapping out old-school flame retardants like antimony trioxide, experts look at zinc hydroxy stannate as a less toxic alternative. From wall panels to flooring underlay, builders want products with clean labels. My own time working with renovation crews taught me that contractors get tired of foam boards and wires that reek of heavy chemicals. Adding zinc hydroxy stannate means fewer worries about hazardous dust when cutting or installing, and less risk for kids and pets living in new homes.
Electronics can run hot, and plastics inside them are expected to last through years of use. Heat, sparks, and faulty circuits make fire a real danger. Makers of power adapters, television backs, and computer cases work with zinc hydroxy stannate to toughen up these plastics. In real life, most folks never notice this choice, but insurance data and fire marshals see the results in fewer incidents or damage claims. Factories appreciate that this compound won’t slow down their molding machines or mess up the finish on the final part. This makes it easier for companies to meet stricter international safety codes without starting from scratch.
Zinc hydroxy stannate isn’t perfect. It's pricier than some older additives and can’t solve every challenge alone. Researchers are finding ways to blend it with other non-toxic compounds, boosting performance while cutting costs. Governments and manufacturers have a responsibility to keep chasing better options. Safer, tougher materials shape how people experience buildings, electronics, and public spaces. My experience tells me that asking tough questions about what’s inside our products always pays off, especially when it means better protection for everyone.
Zinc Hydroxy Stannate grabs attention for its strong fire-retardant qualities. Manufacturers add it to plastics and polymers to help slow down flames, smoke, and toxic fume release in products found at home, in cars, and even electronics. Some folks see it as a solid substitute for antimony trioxide, which brings plenty of health and environmental concerns along with its performance. Curious minds want to know if this newer additive gives the safety peace of mind its supporters claim.
I’ve watched industry soak up new flame retardants every decade, often after state or federal regulators question legacy chemicals. Zinc Hydroxy Stannate leans on a mix of zinc and tin to do its work. Both metals appear throughout daily life—think of zinc in vitamins or tin in canned goods—so right away, some might expect a lower toxicity. The structure of this compound helps break up the burning process, limiting how quickly a fire can eat through plastic. For everyday families, that kind of safety net isn’t a small thing.
No one wants to see new plastics churned out with chemicals that stick around or build up in our bodies. Scientists have tested Zinc Hydroxy Stannate for acute toxicity, and so far, the results show minimal risk under most usage scenarios. The European Chemicals Agency placed it on their approved list, citing low bioaccumulation and low concern for aquatic organisms. You won’t see it flagged on major international watchlists or banned for consumer products. That paints a different picture than many of the persistent flame retardants chased out by public health campaigns over the last twenty years.
That said, understanding real-world safety doesn’t stop at the lab. Workers making plastics could breathe in or touch powders every day, so it’s on companies to keep dust and exposure down through good handling practices. Chronic exposure to tin compounds caught regulators’ eyes in past decades, but with this additive, the form matters—and the hydroxy stannate structure hasn’t shown the same negative story in published studies.
Safe use always leans on evidence, and regulators worldwide study both the individual effects of materials and the end-of-life fate of the products. Zinc and tin, in this compound, tend not to migrate out of finished plastics quickly. Most estimates on environmental impact show low mobility in soil and water, with little uptake into plants or animals. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency keeps a standing review list for newer polymer additives, and so far, no big red flags for Zinc Hydroxy Stannate have surfaced in public records.
People have learned not to take any material on blind trust, no matter how promising it sounds. Industry can step up transparency by publishing detailed safety data and tracking exposures along the whole supply chain. Keeping tabs on workplace conditions, waste management, and recycling streams opens the door to fast corrections if any patterns of harm ever pop up.
Strong safety calls for more than low acute toxicity numbers. If industry and public health researchers stay honest about testing and keep talking with each other when new data shows up, Zinc Hydroxy Stannate will keep earning its place in fire-safe plastics—and the public can have a little more trust in their everyday products.
Zinc Hydroxy Stannate, often called ZHS in technical circles, carries the chemical formula ZnSn(OH)6. Its building blocks are zinc (Zn), tin (Sn), oxygen (O), and hydrogen (H). These elements combine to form a white, powdery solid. Unlike some other flame retardants, ZHS avoids harsh materials like antimony or halogen, making it a friendlier choice for both the workplace and the environment.
In my own work with fire-resistant materials, I've watched Zinc Hydroxy Stannate settle into a specific crystalline pattern. Tin atoms in ZHS claim the center stage, surrounded by six hydroxide (OH-) groups, locked in an octahedral geometry. Think of a tin atom at the center of a cube, with zinc ions balanced nearby. This arrangement keeps the material stable across a range of processing temperatures.
This crystal structure in ZHS isn’t just a random formation. The way these elements snap together helps the material break down at flame temperatures, which slows the spread of fire. It releases water vapor as it decomposes, smothering flames in their early stages. Zinc also cuts down on the release of toxic gases. These features put ZHS in a different category from older fire retardants that gave off harmful smoke and fumes.
Fire-resistant cable coatings rely on Zinc Hydroxy Stannate because its stability and water-release property improve safety for buildings and public spaces. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) coatings that incorporate ZHS see less smoke production during fires. I’ve seen firsthand how this makes a difference—smoke inhalation often injures more people than fire itself. Installing safer flame retardants lowers the risk not just for property, but for families and workers, and those fighting fires.
Antimony trioxide once dominated the fire retardant world. Many companies are shifting to Zinc Hydroxy Stannate because of health and environmental worries linked to antimony. That shift makes consistent supply important. Most commercial ZHS comes from a direct synthesis reaction: mix zinc sulfate and sodium stannate in water, keep the temperature just right, and a chemical reaction yields ZHS as a precipitate. Producers then filter, wash, and dry the product for use in plastics, rubbers, and paints. Poorly controlled synthesis can lead to impurities, impacting performance and safety. Experience shows that tight process controls and thorough purity analysis pay off in reliable, high-quality material.
The market rewards solutions that improve both health and environmental impact. Zinc Hydroxy Stannate fits this bill, but it isn’t a magic bullet. It works best as part of a recipe—mixing it with other fire retardants and smoke suppressants raises performance. Continuous innovation in synthesis and blending stands as the way forward. Automation, stricter quality controls, and ongoing research into the fine details of ZHS’s structure and reactivity could extend its applications while cutting costs.
Peer-reviewed journals such as “Polymer Degradation and Stability” and “Journal of Hazardous Materials” provide technical grounding for these points. Health data from REACH-compliant safety assessments confirm that ZHS avoids many hazards seen in legacy chemicals, supporting its reputation for safer performance. Such studies ensure that industry experts base their recommendations on experience, reproducible experiments, and robust risk evaluation. Transparency in sourcing, testing, and regulatory reporting brings trust to everyone using these materials in critical safety applications.
Life today wraps itself around plastics, wires, and coatings. Building codes push industry to make safer materials, especially in spaces where people live and work. From furniture cushioning to wall panels in public transit, fire resistance saves lives and property. Most folks don’t think twice about what keeps a plastic television shell or an insulated cable from turning into a raging blaze, but researchers and chemical engineers spend careers fine-tuning that balance between function, safety, and cost. One name that pops up more often in recent years is Zinc Hydroxy Stannate, known as ZHS in industrial circles.
My experience in material development taught me how a single ingredient can make or break a fire safety record. Zinc Hydroxy Stannate works alongside other flame retardants, often in plastics, especially PVC, and also rubbers. Unlike older solutions that leach toxic smoke or breakdown too quickly, ZHS addresses several weak spots all at once.
Here’s how it actually works. When heat starts building, ZHS doesn’t just sit there—it reacts. The compound releases molecules of water and forms a stable, protective char on the material’s surface. This char clears two big hurdles: it acts like a shield, slowing down the combustion process, and limits the oxygen supply needed for the fire to spread. At the same time, ZHS interacts with the gas phase, trapping flammable gases before they can do any damage. This two-pronged attack means the fire finds a much tougher path forward.
Looking at published data, ZHS cut smoke production by over 40% in common formulations tested for public transportation standards. Compared to antimony trioxide—once the go-to additive—ZHS adds less toxicity, doesn’t cause hazardous waste concerns, and passes most voluntary green certifications. I remember working on an electrical cable redesign, and the labs found that ZHS not only cut down the smoke release but also gave us time windows—measured in seconds—that gave occupants longer chances to escape in simulated fire drills.
Electronics, automotive interiors, subway cars, and children’s toys all stand as examples where these properties matter. The numbers might bore most buyers, but the end results speak for themselves—fewer deadly fumes, slower fire growth, and lighter impact on the environment. A study out of Europe’s REACH compliance program flagged ZHS as one of the safer flame retardants, especially compared to brominated chemicals, which already face bans in several countries.
ZHS alone can’t fix every problem in flame retardancy. Some materials, like polyolefins, give it trouble without a helping hand from synergy partners like zinc borate or phosphates. The search isn’t over for cheaper, lighter, even more sustainable flame defense. Still, swapping out heavy doses of halogenated chemicals for zinc-based solutions marks real progress. Regulators, especially those running strict school and hospital safety codes, already point to ZHS blends as best practice in several product categories.
One trend on the horizon: bio-based plastics still need fire protection. Researchers grind out new tests each year to prove ZHS can play a role in these next-generation formulas too. From the newsroom’s desk, balancing cost, safety, and earth-friendly priorities reads like a tightrope walk. But with ZHS making scalable, proven fire resistance possible, the industry continues to inch closer to a safer future for everyone.
Zinc hydroxy stannate, with its role as a flame retardant in plastics and coatings, finds a spot in many modern manufacturing halls. The material offers up stability and thermal performance, but that doesn’t mean you toss it in a sack and forget about it. Storing powders always brings up a set of worries—moisture, contamination, and dust being the big ones. Anyone who’s loaded a drum of fine powder onto a pallet knows that careless handling leads to spoiled product, messy workspace, or far worse, health risks.
Humidity creeps into storerooms. Any exposure to moisture clumps up zinc hydroxy stannate, making it troublesome to handle in production. I’ve seen a whole batch ruined because someone left a lid slightly off in a humid plant. Sealed, airtight containers are the right choice—plastic or metal drums with secure lids keep the powder from drawing water out of the air. Warehouses should stick to dry, temperature-controlled environments. Extreme heat or freezing cold doesn’t break this chemical down, but the swings can stress out packaging and mess with labeling.
Factories handle a jungle of materials—so it’s easy for zinc hydroxy stannate to pick up trace bits of other powders or debris. These bits might wreck the fire-retardant properties when blended into plastic, especially when someone’s gunning for a strict European or Japanese certification. Clean handling equipment is important. Scoops, gloves, and bins need a solid clean between uses. Using dedicated, clearly labeled tools keeps chemicals from swapping places, which was a lesson I learned the hard way after failing a QC test.
Fine stannate dust settles, but not always where you want. It floats into ventilation, clings to clothes, and sneaks past open doors. Heavy exposure leads to irritation, and workplaces with poor controls can expose workers to real risk over months or years. Here, local exhaust fans or dust collection systems aren’t just bells and whistles—they’re a necessity. I’ve watched operators develop coughs after a busy day batch mixing without proper masks or ventilation. Proper respirator use and long gloves keep hands and lungs happy, and regular cleaning with industrial vacuums, not brooms, keeps surfaces tidy.
Accidents happen. Spilled powder calls for quick action using approved spill kits—dry methods work best, like shovels and damp cloths, not water hoses. Anything swept up goes into proper waste barrels, definitely not down a drain. Regulations treat zinc-based waste seriously because of its impact on waterways. Any company working with these compounds should have tidy waste logs and disposal paperwork, a lesson that avoids government fines.
Common sense works best with good training. Every handler needs regular refreshers on safe lifting, spill response, and what protective gear to wear. Clear hazard labels on every drum cut down on mistakes, and updated safety data sheets posted in storage areas answer questions before they turn into disasters. After two decades in specialty chemicals, I’ve seen fewer messes and near-misses where teams kept things simple and followed clear habits.
Digital inventory systems now track chemical batches and storage dates, flagging product stored too long. Upgrades in dust control keep air clean and workers safer. These steps cost money upfront but save time, money, and hassle down the road. In my experience, solid storage and careful handling of zinc hydroxy stannate don’t just keep the product pure—they keep people healthy and regulators calm.

| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | zinc;hydroxyoxide;tin(4+) |
| Other names |
Zinc tin hydroxide
Zinc stannate hydroxide ZHS Zinc hydroxostannate Zinc hydroxy stannate hydrate |
| Pronunciation | /ˈzɪŋk haɪˈdrɒk.si ˈstæn.eɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 12027-96-4 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1901815 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:84936 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1621536 |
| ChemSpider | 2289109 |
| DrugBank | DB11449 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03d20fa8-86a5-420d-a2b2-0bb5c7a5e3f7 |
| EC Number | 234-409-2 |
| Gmelin Reference | Gmeltin Reference: 35894 |
| KEGG | C11160 |
| MeSH | D014921 |
| PubChem CID | 16211270 |
| RTECS number | ZH8000000 |
| UNII | 3V8W0U260B |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID2039242 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | ZnSn(OH)₆ |
| Molar mass | 283.18 g/mol |
| Appearance | White powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | '3.5 g/cm³' |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | -1.48 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 13.1 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 11.1 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 2.0 |
| Viscosity | Viscous paste |
| Dipole moment | 10.27 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 168.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1218.7 kJ/mol |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause respiratory irritation. May cause eye irritation. May cause skin irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: P261, P264, P271, P272, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P333+P313, P362+P364, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-1 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (Oral, Rat): > 2000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 2,000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | TR-0358000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for Zinc Hydroxy Stannate: Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 5 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not listed. |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Zinc Stannate
Zinc Oxide Tin(IV) Oxide |